Natural explanations should be given primary reference over supernatural explanations
Negation: Supernatural explanations should be given primary reference over natural explanations 0 0 0
2 Arguments
0 Citations
1 Consequence
1 Mention
Arguments
Opposing Arguments
No opposing arguments found
Citations
No citations found
Consequences
Argument #9385ef2b 0 0 1
If it is true that...
The post-mortem sightings of Jesus Christ could not have been the product of hallucination 0 0 1and
Natural explanations should be given primary reference over supernatural explanations 0 0 1and
The natural explanation of the alleged witnesses lying or conspiring about Jesus Christ's post-mortem appearances is false 0 0 1and
The natural explanation of Jesus Christ recovering miraculously and appearing post-mortem is false 0 0 1Then it must be true that...
The most likely natural explanations of Jesus Christ's post-mortem appearances are false 0 0 1Mentions
Related Propositions
God’s existence is not merely an object of natural rational knowledge, but also an object of supernatural faith 1 0 2The immediate vision of God transcends the natural power of cognition of the human soul, and is therefore supernatural 1 0 2What brought nature into existence is not natural, it must be supernatural 1 0 2There exists something beyond our understanding of natural laws that must be at play here 1 0 2There is no satisfactory proof for the existence of a supernatural being 1 0 2Humans believe what seems to be true without a better reason to think otherwise 1 0 2Explanations that recur more often should be considered first 0 0 1Natural phenomena occur more often than supernatural phenomena 0 0 1The most likely natural explanations of Jesus Christ's post-mortem appearances are false 0 0 1If the naturalistic explanations for the universe are not true, it is likely there was a creator 0 0 1