What brought nature into existence is not natural, it must be supernatural
1 Argument
0 Citations
0 Consequences
2 Mentions
Arguments
Argument #96b1a566 1 0 2
If it is true that...
Nature cannot bring itself into existence 1 0 2Then it must be true that...
What brought nature into existence is not natural, it must be supernatural 1 0 2Opposing Arguments
No opposing arguments found
Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
0•
Updated
Related Propositions
God’s existence is not merely an object of natural rational knowledge, but also an object of supernatural faith 1 0 2The nature considered absolutely abstracts from every existence, though it does not exclude the existence of anything either 1 0 2Everything the existence of which is other than its own nature has existence from another 1 0 2Existence received from God allows substances to subsist in the nature of things 1 0 2Everything that begins to exist must have a cause 2 0 2Nature cannot bring itself into existence 1 0 2If space, time, and matter all came into being from nothing, this defies our understanding of natural laws 1 0 2There exists something beyond our understanding of natural laws that must be at play here 1 0 2Matter needs a cause because nothing about it demands its own existence 1 0 2If the naturalistic explanations for the universe are not true, it is likely there was a creator 0 0 1