What brought nature into existence is natural, it must not be supernatural
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
0 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
Argument #96b1a566 1 0 2
If it is true that...
Nature cannot bring itself into existence 1 0 2Then it must be true that...
What brought nature into existence is not natural, it must be supernatural 1 0 2Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
No mentions found
Related Propositions
God’s existence is not merely an object of natural rational knowledge, but also an object of supernatural faith 1 0 2The nature considered absolutely abstracts from every existence, though it does not exclude the existence of anything either 1 0 2Everything the existence of which is other than its own nature has existence from another 1 0 2Existence received from God allows substances to subsist in the nature of things 1 0 2Nature cannot bring itself into existence 1 0 2If space, time, and matter all came into being from nothing, this defies our understanding of natural laws 1 0 2What brought nature into existence is not natural, it must be supernatural 1 0 2There is no satisfactory proof for the existence of a supernatural being 1 0 2Natural explanations should be given primary reference over supernatural explanations 0 0 1If the naturalistic explanations for the universe are not true, it is likely there was a creator 0 0 1