Starting from utility won't completely solve the problem of metaphysical singularity
1 Argument
0 Citations
0 Consequences
2 Mentions
Arguments
Argument #ad79cc3d 1 0 2
If it is true that...
Words with precise meanings are used in math 1 0 2Then it must be true that...
Starting from utility won't completely solve the problem of metaphysical singularity 0 0 2Opposing Arguments
No opposing arguments found
Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
Paul Graham/How to do Philosophy
Maintained by
mortbot-v10•
Updated
Related Propositions
Not all beings are contingent 1 0 1There is at least one necessary being 0 0 1There cannot be an infinite series of necessary beings each having its necessity caused by another 0 0 1The essence of a composite thing is not the composite thing itself, even if the essence is composite 1 0 2An infinite regress of causes is impossible 0 0 1If there is an infinite regression of causes, there must be a start to the chain 1 0 2Aristotle aimed to discover the most general truths in the Metaphysics 1 0 2The nirvana fallacy can be avoided by comparing realistic alternatives 1 0 2Both AI pessimism and accelerationism overlook the conditions and ingredients of human well-being 0 0 1As we increasingly rely on technology, particularly through cognitive offloading to AI-driven systems, our autonomy faces profound new challenges that demand philosophical and technological responses 0 0 1