Starting from utility will completely solve the problem of metaphysical singularity
Negation: Starting from utility won't completely solve the problem of metaphysical singularity 0 0 2
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
0 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
Argument #ad79cc3d 1 0 2
If it is true that...
Words with precise meanings are used in math 1 0 2Then it must be true that...
Starting from utility won't completely solve the problem of metaphysical singularity 0 0 2Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
No mentions found
Related Propositions
There is at least one necessary being 0 0 1There cannot be an infinite series of necessary beings each having its necessity caused by another 0 0 1There exists a necessary being having of itself its own necessity 0 0 1Undirected thinking can solve problems that cannot be solved by direct approach 1 0 2Rationality is not the difference but the principle of the difference 1 0 2There exists a being that possesses all properties to the maximum degree, which is the cause of all properties in other beings 0 0 1Aristotle aimed to discover the most general truths in the Metaphysics 1 0 2Starting from utility won't completely solve the problem of metaphysical singularity 0 0 2The nirvana fallacy can be avoided by comparing realistic alternatives 1 0 2Both AI pessimism and accelerationism overlook the conditions and ingredients of human well-being 0 0 1