The two main views shaping today's conversation around AI are existential pessimism and accelerationism
0 Arguments
0 Citations
1 Consequence
1 Mention
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
No opposing arguments found
Citations
No citations found
Consequences
Argument #2597c926 0 0 1
If it is true that...
The two main views shaping today's conversation around AI are existential pessimism and accelerationism 0 0 1and
Both AI pessimism and accelerationism overlook the conditions and ingredients of human well-being 0 0 1Then it must be true that...
There are currently no major approaches to AI that prioritize human well-being 0 0 1Mentions
0•
Updated
Related Propositions
Some proponents of AI accelerationism push the human good to the margins 0 0 1Both AI pessimism and accelerationism overlook the conditions and ingredients of human well-being 0 0 1We need a new approach for AI that embraces technological progress while keeping human flourishing as its north star 0 0 1There are currently no major approaches to AI that prioritize human well-being 0 0 1AI could tempt us to accept easy answers instead of actively engaging in the search for truth 0 0 1We must build AI that encourages inquiry over complacency and promotes active engagement over passive dependence 0 0 1If we don't actively build AI for good, its evil outcomes may manifest 0 0 1AI that decentralizes power and enables bottom-up solutions would allow individuals and communities to co-create a richer, more diverse society 0 0 1Current AI systems and their governance are tending towards non-vibrant society 0 0 1As we increasingly rely on technology, particularly through cognitive offloading to AI-driven systems, our autonomy faces profound new challenges that demand philosophical and technological responses 0 0 1