San Francisco's functionality is compromised due to its emphasis on global impact over local improvement, leading to the neglect of local civic institutions and development
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
2 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
No opposing arguments found
Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
Zak Slaybak/Adventure Capitalism 01.0
Maintained by
mortbot-v10•
Updated
Related Propositions
The difference between cities is a matter of degree 1 0 2The environment can be supportive, but it can also divert development from an optimal course 1 0 3San Francisco has not permitted sufficient housing construction for several decades 1 0 2San Francisco needs to add 10,259 housing units each year until 2031 to meet its housing demand 1 0 2Currently, San Francisco is authorizing less than one new housing unit per day 1 0 2Under-building leads to a competition for existing housing, which increases rents and prices out all but the wealthiest 1 0 2Critics of charter cities commit a nirvana fallacy by worrying about them becoming playgrounds for the rich and powerful, ignoring the reality where the rich and powerful already control many existing institutions 1 0 2Ethical frameworks propose that local obligations should be prioritized over global ones 1 0 2The funnel model, which prioritizes global impact, may not result in local improvement due to resource and knowledge constraints 1 0 2A governance model that pushes for a particular vision of fairness, or the desire to centralize power, can subtly erode individual freedom of action 0 0 1