Only the second divine person became man
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
2 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
No opposing arguments found
Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
Related Propositions
Jesus Christ became man 1 0 2The second Divine Person proceeds from the first Divine Person by generation, and therefore is related to him as Son to a Father 1 0 2The three divine persons are in one another 1 0 2The three divine persons are one single, common principle of the creation 1 0 2The divine and the human natures are united hypostatically in Christ, that is, joined to each other in one person 1 0 2The human and the divine activities predicated of Christ in Holy Writ and in the Fathers may not be divided between two persons or hypostases, the Man-Christ and the God-Logos, but must be attributed to the one Christ, the Logos become flesh. It is the Divine Logos, who suffered in the flesh, was crucified, died, and rose again 1 0 2The hypostatic union of Christ's human nature with the Divine Logos took place at the moment of conception 1 0 2Not only as God but also as man, Jesus Christ is the natural Son of God 1 0 2Christ's divine and human characteristics and activities are to be predicated of the one Word Incarnate 1 0 2The Son of God became man in order to redeem men 1 0 2