Labour can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent into a social power capable of being monopolised when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeois property

Negation: Labour can still be converted into capital, money, or rent into a social power capable of being monopolised when individual property can still be transformed into bourgeois property 0 0 0

1 Argument

0 Citations

3 Consequences

2 Mentions

Arguments

Argument #6e652deb 1 0 2

If it is true that...

Private property in existing society is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population 1 0 2

Then it must be true that...

Labour can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent into a social power capable of being monopolised when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeois property 1 0 2

Opposing Arguments

No opposing arguments found

Citations

No citations found

Consequences

Argument #54f1b755 1 0 2

If it is true that...

Private property in existing society is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population 1 0 2

and

Labour can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent into a social power capable of being monopolised when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeois property 1 0 2

Then it must be true that...

The abolition of private property is intended by communists 1 0 2

Argument #ded2eb0a 1 0 2

If it is true that...

Labour can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent into a social power capable of being monopolised when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeois property 1 0 2

and

Communism deprives no man of power to appropriate products of society but deprives him of power to subjugate labour of others by means of such appropriations 1 0 2

Then it must be true that...

Bourgeois society should have gone to dogs through idleness as those who work acquire nothing and those who acquire anything do not work 1 0 2

Argument #ef4c797f 1 0 2

If it is true that...

Private property in existing society is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population 1 0 2

and

Labour can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent into a social power capable of being monopolised when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeois property 1 0 2

Then it must be true that...

Communism deprives no man of power to appropriate products of society but deprives him of power to subjugate labour of others by means of such appropriations 1 0 2

Mentions

Karl Marx/The Communist Manifesto

Maintained by

0•

Updated

Related Propositions

The bourgeoisie has ended all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations and replaced them with naked self-interest and cash payment 1 0 2 Free competition replaced feudal relations of property, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted to it and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class 1 0 2 The essential condition for existence and sway of bourgeois class is formation and augmentation of capital which rests on wage-labour and competition among labourers 1 0 2 Modern bourgeois private property is based on class antagonisms and exploitation of many by few 1 0 2 Wage-labour does not create any property for the labourer but creates capital, a kind of property that exploits wage-labour 1 0 2 Capital is a collective product and a social power 1 0 2 In bourgeois society, living labour is a means to increase accumulated labour while in communist society, accumulated labour is a means to promote existence of the labourer 1 0 2 In bourgeois society, capital is independent and has individuality while the living person is dependent and has no individuality 1 0 2 Both the bourgeois family and its complement will vanish with the vanishing of capital 1 0 2 The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest all capital from the bourgeoisie and centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the state 1 0 2