There doesn't need to be an intelligent being that directs all non-intelligent objects towards their end
Negation: There must be an intelligent being that directs all non-intelligent objects towards their end 0 0 1
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
0 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
Argument #f307d446 0 0 1
If it is true that...
Non-intelligent objects consistently act towards an end 0 0 1and
Acting towards an end is characteristic of intelligence 0 0 1and
Non-intelligent objects cannot act towards an end unless directed by an intelligent being 0 0 1Then it must be true that...
There must be an intelligent being that directs all non-intelligent objects towards their end 0 0 1Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
No mentions found
Related Propositions
Everything that begins to exist has a cause 1 0 3Not all beings are contingent 1 0 1There exists a being that possesses all properties to the maximum degree, which is the cause of all properties in other beings 0 0 1Matter needs a cause because nothing about it demands its own existence 1 0 2There must be an intelligent being that directs all non-intelligent objects towards their end 0 0 1Non-intelligent objects consistently act towards an end 0 0 1Acting towards an end is characteristic of intelligence 0 0 1Non-intelligent objects cannot act towards an end unless directed by an intelligent being 0 0 1The universe exhibits complex and purposeful design 0 0 1Complex and purposeful design implies a designer 0 0 1