Valuing truth, reason, evidence, and argument does not necessitate belief in the existence of God
Negation: Valuing truth, reason, evidence, and argument necessitates belief in the existence of God 1 0 2
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
0 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
Argument #4bd224bb 1 0 2
If it is true that...
Christ is the truth 1 0 2Then it must be true that...
Valuing truth, reason, evidence, and argument necessitates belief in the existence of God 1 0 2Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
No mentions found
Related Propositions
For any proposition P, if it is not possible for an evil being of supreme power to convince me of P when P is false, then I cannot rationally doubt P 0 0 1God’s existence is not merely an object of natural rational knowledge, but also an object of supernatural faith 1 0 2God can be known with certainty by the natural light of reason through the creative world 1 0 2Valuing truth, reason, evidence, and argument necessitates belief in the existence of God 1 0 2Belief in God is a following of reason, not a leap of faith 1 0 2A person can be moral without belief in god 1 0 2Scientific truth is value-free 0 0 1Science offers truth without values 0 0 1The best explanation for objective moral values is a moral lawgiver 0 0 1The human experience of meaning, purpose, and longing for the transcendent aligns with the Christian narrative of a purposeful creation by God 0 0 1