The essence of man and the essence of Socrates differ more than the signate differs from the non-signate
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
0 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
Argument #31d935de 1 0 2
If it is true that...
Signate matter is not included in the definition of man as man, but signate matter would be included in the definition of Socrates if Socrates had a definition 1 0 2Then it must be true that...
The essence of man and the essence of Socrates do not differ except as the signate differs from the non-signate 1 0 2Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
No mentions found
Related Propositions
Matter alone is not the essence of the thing 1 0 2The essence is that which is signified by the definition of the thing 1 0 2Signate matter is not included in the definition of man as man, but signate matter would be included in the definition of Socrates if Socrates had a definition 1 0 2The essence of man and the essence of Socrates do not differ except as the signate differs from the non-signate 1 0 2The essence of a genus and the essence of a species differ as signate from non-signate 1 0 2Humanity signifies the essence of man as a part, excluding all designation 1 0 2The term man and humanity both signify the essence of man, though in diverse ways 1 0 2The term man signifies the essence as a whole, implicitly and indistinctly containing designation of matter 1 0 2The term humanity signifies the essence of man as a part, excluding all designation 1 0 2Human nature, considered absolutely, is properly predicated of Socrates 1 0 2