Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, do not stand in constant opposition to one another
0 Arguments
0 Citations
0 Consequences
0 Mentions
Arguments
No arguments found
Opposing Arguments
Citations
No citations found
Consequences
No arguments found
Mentions
No mentions found
Related Propositions
Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, stand in constant opposition to one another 1 0 2This opposition results in an uninterrupted fight that ends either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society or in the common ruin of the contending classes 1 0 2Free competition replaced feudal relations of property, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted to it and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class 1 0 2As the bourgeoisie develops, so does the proletariat, a class of laborers who live only as long as they find work and who find work only as long as their labor increases capital 1 0 2Collisions between individual workmen and individual bourgeois take on the character of collisions between two classes 1 0 2The organization of proletarians into a class is continually upset by competition between the workers themselves 1 0 2Every form of society has been based on antagonism between oppressing and oppressed classes 1 0 2The bourgeoisie is unfit to be the ruling class as it cannot assure an existence to its slave within his slavery 1 0 2National differences and antagonism between peoples are daily more vanishing due to the development of the bourgeoisie, freedom of commerce, the world market, uniformity in production and corresponding conditions of life 1 0 2In place of the old bourgeois society with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association where the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all 1 0 2